01 Record
CVE-2009-1223
aspWebCalendar Free Edition stores sensitive information under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to download a database containing user credentials via a
UnratedPUBLISHEDCNA: mitre
CNA base scoreUnratedNo CNA CVSS vector
02 Description
aspWebCalendar Free Edition stores sensitive information under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to download a database containing user credentials via a
03 Exploitation and scoring
- Exploitation
- Not assessed. CISA has not published an exploitation assessment for this record, and it is not in the KEV catalog. That is an absence of assessment, not a finding of no risk.
- SSVC decision
- Not assessed by CISA
- EPSS probability
- 1.06% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.
- EPSS percentile
- Equal to or higher than the score of 64.4% of scored records. A rank, not a probability.
- NVD base score
- The NVD has published no score for this record
- NVD CVSS vector
- No NVD score to derive
- NVD analysis status
- Modified. NVD last modified this record on 2026-06-16.
- Red Hat severity
- No Red Hat rating. Red Hat rates the CVEs that affect its products.
Exploit-prediction scores from FIRST. Independent scoring and analysis status from the NVD. Vendor severity from Red Hat. Exploitation assessment and catalog membership from CISA.
04 Metadata
- Published
- 2009-04-02 15:00Z17 YR AGO
- Last updated
- 2024-08-07 05:04Z2 YR AGO
- Reserved
- 2009-04-02
- Assigning CNA
- mitre
- Record state
- PUBLISHED
- Severity
- Not rated by the issuing CNA
- CNA CVSS vector
- Not published by the issuing CNA
- Weaknesses
- Data version
- 5.1
- Document digest
- 0c35c4356ae74517c6fd5a803d60fefb07e4492ff102f4e160318ac872096823
05 Affected products
VendorProductVersionsPlatforms
06 References
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.comaspwebcalendar-calendar-info-disclosure(49885)https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/49885
- www.securityfocus.com20090331 aspWebCalendar Free Edition bughttp://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/502311/100/0/threaded