CVE-1999-1593

Exploitation

Not assessed. CISA has not published an exploitation assessment for this record, and it is not in the KEV catalog. That is an absence of assessment, not a finding of no risk.

SSVC decision

Not assessed by CISA

EPSS probability

18.13% probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

EPSS percentile

Ranks above 96.9% of scored records. A rank, not a probability.

NVD base score

The NVD has published no score for this record

NVD CVSS vector

No NVD score to derive

NVD analysis status

Modified. NVD last modified this record on 2026-06-16.

Red Hat severity

No Red Hat rating. Red Hat rates the CVEs that affect its products.

Exploit-prediction scores from FIRST. Independent scoring and analysis status from the NVD. Vendor severity from Red Hat. Exploitation assessment and catalog membership from CISA.

Published

2009-01-15 01:00Z17 YR AGO

Last updated

2024-09-16 23:06Z1 YR AGO

Reserved

2009-01-14

Assigning CNA

mitre

Record state

PUBLISHED

Severity

Not rated by the issuing CNA

CNA CVSS vector

Not published by the issuing CNA

Weaknesses

• CWE-59Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')Base

Data version

5.1

Document digest

7b3df3ffb4a89eda907482ea3b11b1a2f22124e999b989f3ff0b9183eb9483e0

• archives.neohapsis.com19990302 NT Domain DoS and Security Exploit with SAMBA Serverhttp://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/ntbugtraq/1998-1999/msg00371.htmlmailing-listx_refsource_NTBUGTRAQ
• seclists.org20010118 Re: Invalid WINS entrieshttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0271.htmlmailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
• www2.sans.orghttps://www2.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/win2k/185.phpx_refsource_MISC
• www.securityfocus.com2221http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/2221vdb-entryx_refsource_BID
• seclists.org20010117 Invalid WINS entrieshttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0264.htmlmailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
• seclists.org20010119 Re: Invalid WINS entrieshttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0298.htmlmailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
• seclists.org20010117 Re: Invalid WINS entrieshttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0276.htmlmailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
• seclists.org20010118 Re: Invalid WINS entrieshttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0289.htmlmailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
• seclists.org20010117 Re: Invalid WINS entrieshttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0274.htmlmailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
• seclists.org20010117 Re: Invalid WINS entrieshttp://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0269.htmlmailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ